by Janis Susan
May/Janis Patterson
I admit I spend waaaay too much time on email loops,
especially those for writers. Some are aimed at and restricted to working
professional writers and I love them! Some are open to anyone and sometimes I
love them, sometimes I don't, because the view of the wider writing community
is occasionally terrifying.
On one open list a writer proudly announced that she had
finished her first book and then asked if she reeaaally needed an editor before
publishing it on Amazon. If that weren't bad enough, over half the answers said
no - that she just needed a friend or two to look it over, or she herself
should go over it a couple of times.
What?
I suppose sometime somewhere there is a writer who doesn't
need an editor, but I sincerely doubt that a first time novelist is one of
them. Especially one whose post had two grammatical errors.
Grammar is important. Grammar gives structure, meaning and
coherence to our writing. It shouldn't be ignored, because bad grammar says two
things - either that the writer is excruciatingly ignorant, or that he/she has complete
disdain for his/her readers, believing that they are too stupid to notice. Of
course, this applies only to the narrative part of a book. Whatever is
said/thought by a character should be congruent with that character. A dock
laborer is going to speak differently than an Oxford don. A wealthy teen-ager
is going to speak differently than an aged, unschooled farm widow. So I have
always held that anything in quote marks or this-is-a-direct-thought-italics is
exempt from the rules of grammar, but the narrative prose of a book is not.
Don't they teach grammar any longer? Apparently not, because
a couple of days later, on a different - but another open - list, a different
poster asked a very elementary question about how to start a book. Now there is
nothing wrong with asking a very elementary question; we all have been there at
some time and every writer has to learn. Two things made my blood run cold.
The first was the post was written with such execrable
grammar that a third grader should have been ashamed to own it. I replied, mentioning
that she might want to brush up on her grammar, then gave a reasonably detailed
answer to her question. The second thing was that without exception others on
the list attacked me, saying that anyone could make a grammar mistake (which I
agree - ONE mistake in a questioning post, not multiples, nor such huge ones),
that someone later in the editing process could catch the 'mechanical' errors,
that this new writer could probably reach more people's emotions than I ever
could with my perfect grammar... You get the idea. I even received a few
threats to boycott my books because I am such a heartless grammar Nazi who puts
rules above True Feelings.
So when did holding to a standard become not only passé, but
almost dangerous for those who do? Language is the means by which we communicate.
If the rules of language are disregarded and allowed to crumble, communication
is imperiled. And that threatens all of us - readers, writers, and everyone
else.
On another note, I would like to say that my YouTube channel
is up and running - and I would be most appreciative if you would drop by. It's
called Janis' Tips and Tales, and a
new episode is released on the fourth Thursday of every month. Thank you!
